Minimal from Classical Proofs
نویسنده
چکیده
Let A be a formula without implications, and Γ consist of formulas containing disjunction and falsity only negatively and implication only positively. Orevkov (1968) and Nadathur (2000) proved that classical derivability of A from Γ implies intuitionistic derivability, by a transformation of derivations in sequent calculi. We give a new proof of this result (for minimal rather than intuitionistic logic), where the input data are natural deduction proofs in long normal form (given as proof terms via the Curry-Howard correspondence) involving stability axioms for relations; the proof gives a quadratic algorithm to remove the stability axioms. This can be of interest for computational uses of classical proofs.
منابع مشابه
On the pointfree counterpart of the local definition of classical continuous maps
The familiar classical result that a continuous map from a space $X$ to a space $Y$ can be defined by giving continuous maps $varphi_U: U to Y$ on each member $U$ of an open cover ${mathfrak C}$ of $X$ such that $varphi_Umid U cap V = varphi_V mid U cap V$ for all $U,V in {mathfrak C}$ was recently shown to have an exact analogue in pointfree topology, and the same was done for the familiar cla...
متن کاملGlivenko sequent classes in the light of structural proof theory
In 1968, Orevkov presented proofs of conservativity of classical over intuitionistic and minimal predicate logic with equality for seven classes of sequents, what are known as Glivenko classes. The proofs of these results, important in the literature on the constructive content of classical theories, have remained somehow cryptic. In this paper, direct proofs for more general extensions are giv...
متن کاملSome Pitfalls of LK-to-LJ Translations and How to Avoid Them
In this paper, we investigate translations from a classical cut-free sequent calculus LK into an intuitionistic cut-free sequent calculus LJ. Translations known from the literature rest on permutations of inferences in classical proofs. We show that, for some classes of rst-order formulae, all minimal LJ-proofs are non-elementary but there exist short LK-proofs of the same formula. Similar resu...
متن کاملHow Many Times Do We Need an Assumption to Prove a Tautology in Minimal Logic: An Example on the Compression Power of Classical Reasoning
In this article we present a class of formulas φn, n ∈ Nat, that need at least 2 assumption occurrences to be proved in a normal proof in Natural Deduction for purely implicational minimal propositional logic. In purely implicational classical propositional logic, with Peirce’s rule, each φn is proved with only one assumption occurrence in Natural Deduction in a normal proof. Besides that, the ...
متن کاملThe Peirce Translation and the Double Negation Shift
We develop applications of selection functions to proof theory and computational extraction of witnesses from proofs in classical analysis. The main novelty is a translation of classical minimal logic into minimal logic, which we refer to as the Peirce translation, and which we apply to interpret both a strengthening of the double-negation shift and the axioms of countable and dependent choice,...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Ann. Pure Appl. Logic
دوره 164 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1991